Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
Дата
Msg-id 23258.1349100421@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?
Список pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that
> are behind the fencing behavior.

I think the key reason is that we don't want partial execution of DML
operations (ie, INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE inside a WITH).  The fencing
behavior was put in originally because we foresaw adding DML later.

We could possibly relax the rule for WITH SELECT only, but it would
be rather inconsistent, not to mention unpleasant for all the people
who are relying on the current behavior for one reason or another.

Another issue is that if the CTE is scanned multiple times by the outer
query, you really can't optimize it on the basis of any one call site.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Karl O. Pinc"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doc patch, further describe and-mask nature of the permission system v2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash id in pg_stat_statements