Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 16:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... and, if you are seriously expecting to have that happen, why the
>> patch was submitted to pgsql-jdbc not pgsql-hackers?
> To be fair to David, it was sent to *both* pgsql-jdbc and
> pgsql-hackers. Maybe it was held for moderation on one and arrived out
> of order?
... Oh. My apologies to David. My copy came through via pgsql-jdbc,
and I wasn't awake enough to notice it'd been posted to -hackers too.
regards, tom lane