Re: Exponantial Function (exp) with bigger argument ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exponantial Function (exp) with bigger argument ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23172.1304445664@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Exponantial Function (exp) with bigger argument ? ("Gregor GT. Trefs" <gregor.trefs@delphit.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exponantial Function (exp) with bigger argument ?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
"Gregor GT. Trefs" <gregor.trefs@delphit.com> writes: > Is there any possibility to overcome the restriction to not use a > higher number than appr. 100 as an argument for the exponential > function in postgres ? What restriction? regression=# select exp(1000.0); exp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 197007112172228764285408431116443651047300981094802008755853985828350443654498948052236544085754035611119684706809582853182955874910502440327439392806215139501177952207939837125875818468684009900351395991300432715505235653014871192637790968152087501139107799418773107714238073871162818125586289629983090134192022542188366296411429692950563401460360277794420292466575635467954804734395417151344955106563797211636884598324669752528955502.2 (1 row) Mind you, it would be unwise to assume that that answer is *exact* ... exactly what is the "business logic" that requires such large exponentials, and are you sure you're getting non-garbage results on any other platform? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: