Re: Typed table DDL loose ends

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What about inverting the message phrasing, ie
>> 
>> ERROR: type stuff must not be a table's row type

> It also can't be a view's row type, a sequence's row type, a foreign
> table's row type...

Well, you could say "relation's row type" if you wanted to be formally
correct, but I'm not convinced that's an improvement.
        regards, tom lane