Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23014.1220889431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> So thinking we should test XLogArchiveCheckDone() for both
>> stopxlogfilename and history file and then stat for the stop WAL file:
> This seems better.
Somehow I missed the 5-Apr patch that introduced this bogosity.
Next time you make a fundamental change in the behavior of a function,
how about updating its comment to match?
After studying it for a minute, I think that XLogArchiveCheckDone no
longer even has a clearly explainable purpose; it needs to be split
into two functions with two different behaviors. I plan to revert
XLogArchiveCheckDone to its previous behavior and introduce
XLogArchiveIsBusy (flipping the sense of the result) to use in
pg_stop_backup.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: