Re: PostgreSQL mission statement?
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22df01c1f1df$8a29c9c0$ad02000a@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL mission statement? (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I don't know about you, but I want PostgreSQL to be the best, be THE most > > reliable. Omitting "best" or "most" from the statement means that we should > > all just give up now, because PostgreSQL is pretty damn good already. > > i think a mission statement full of boastfulness is just a sound bite, and > will be dismissed as such. Theres no reason Postgresql can't be the best in a good majority if not all of the fields. Yeah, a few things are needed to accomplish this -- but theres no reason it can't happen. Anyway, most companies do something like 'Postgresql will become the choice database'. That is, majority market share. That said, they're dumb. They need to be changed once you meet the goal. A good mission statement should last the lifetime of the company / department / project. WalMart actually has one of the better ones, where their mission is to beat last years sales by x%. 3M will innovate. HP would not release a product unless it offered the market something new or better (they don't [ didn't for years anyway ] clone others stuff and undercut them in price). Perhaps Postgresql should have the mission of handling twice the amount of data this year than last. That is, all collective installations will maintain more stuff. Difficult to measure, but would ensure we create / maintain the features required by big and small databases. Currently those features appear to be relational design, reliability, etc. Should the data storage requirements change, Postgresql would have to follow in order to maintain it's mission statement which is a good thing. Goals should change, (being most reliable, or ANSI compliant) but purpose should be consistent. That said, skip the whole thing. I don't think we need something to rally behind as it's kinda self explanatory why you'd donate time or money to the project. It needs to meet your needs first, which averaged out between all of the developers will meet those of most others. DBs work that way, desktops often don't ;)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: