Re: Variadic parameters vs parameter defaults

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 20:50:22 Tom Lane wrote:
>> The behavior at zero arguments is
>> certainly a judgment call, but it seems to me that we'll wind up with
>> more warts and less flexibility if we try to make the system install a
>> default behavior for that case.

> Maybe we'll just let it be for now and see what kind of user demands we get.

Fair enough.  We could possibly have the system install a "default
default" for variadic arguments, but I'd rather add that later
on the basis of demand than stick it in now.
        regards, tom lane