Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors
Дата
Msg-id 22890.1586616889@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на relcache leak warnings vs. errors  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> How about a compile-time option to turn all the warnings in resowner.c 
> into errors?  This could be enabled automatically by --enable-cassert, 
> similar to other defines that that option enables.

[ itch... ]  Those calls occur post-commit; throwing an error there
is really a mess, which is why it's only WARNING now.

I guess you could make them PANICs, but it would be an option that nobody
could possibly want to have enabled in anything resembling production.
So I"m kind of -0.5 on making --enable-cassert do it automatically.
Although I suppose that it's not really worse than other assertion
failures.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cleaning perl code