Re: move 'Value' node into separate file
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: move 'Value' node into separate file | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22837.1073418363@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | move 'Value' node into separate file (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: move 'Value' node into separate file | 
| Список | pgsql-patches | 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> This patch separates the 'Value' and 'List' nodes: now the Value node
> has its own interface (i.e. header) and implementation files. This is
> just house-keeping, in preparation for the list rewrite.
This is just cleanup, right?  Or were you intending that something will
happen to Value in connection with the List changes?  I can't think
what offhand ...
One trivial gripe: you forgot to change the filename in the new value.c
file's header comment.  Looks OK otherwise.
> I renumbered a NodeTag: does that require a catalog version number
> bump?
It does not.  NodeTag numbers appear only in in-memory data structures.
(It does tend to require a backend-wide recompile, but hopefully most
people have learned by now to use --enable-depend or else "make clean"
after every CVS update.)
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: