Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22819.1049315158@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Basically, one should only turn this variable on after giving up on the
>> possibility of getting any data out of the broken page itself. It would
>> be folly to run with it turned on as a normal setting.
> This statement should *definitely* go into the documentation for the
> option, then...
Andrew Sullivan expressed concern about this, too. The thing could
be made a little more failsafe if we made it impossible to set
ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true in postgresql.conf, or by any means other
than an actual SET command --- whose impact would then be limited to
the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism,
but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to
refuse non-interactive settings).
Comments?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: