Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22780.987717527@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2 (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)) |
| Ответы |
Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> Of course not, it's not a bug - if this is a problem, it's a bug in
> Postgresql:
If glibc 2.2.2 sorts that way in C locale, then glibc is broken.
But I assume you meant this is the behavior in some other locale.
Postgres as such can cope just fine with non-C sort orders, but it
seems quite possible that the koi8 regression test sample outputs were
constructed using C-locale sort rules. Since the original complainant
merely asserted those tests were broken without defining what he meant
by broken, we're pretty much wasting our time speculating...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: