Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Дата
Msg-id 22744.1501430710@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 01:21:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think it'd be a good idea to insist that "prove" be in
>> the same directory we found "perl" in.

> Nah; on my machines, I use /usr/bin/perl and ~/sw/cpan/bin/prove.  The latter
> is built against the former, so there's no particular hazard.

Well, OK, but I'd still like to tweak configure so that it records
an absolute path for prove rather than just setting PROVE=prove.
That way you'd at least be able to tell from the configure log
whether you are possibly at risk.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?