Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Glen Huang
Тема Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter?
Дата
Msg-id 22709A59-3CE7-40F5-8914-C85F2114E1E5@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] How to create unique index on multiple columns wherethe combination doesn't matter?  (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Yes, the order doesn't matter, and this approach sounds like a good idea. I'll try it out, thanks.

On 23 Mar 2017, at 3:56 PM, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote:


On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:54, Glen Huang <hey.hgl@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

If I have a table like

CREATE TABLE relationship (
obj1 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object, 
obj2 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
obj3 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
...
)

And I want to constrain that if 1,2,3 is already in the table, rows like 1,3,2 or 2,1,3 shouldn't be allowed.

Is there a general solution to this problem?

Does the order of the values of (obj1, obj2, obj3) in relationship matter? If not, you could swap them around on INSERT/UPDATE to be in sorted order. I'd probably go with a BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger.

In addition, to prevent unsorted entry, on obj2 add CHECK (obj2 > obj1) and on obj3 add CHECK (obj3 > obj2).

Now you can create a normal PK or unique key on (obj1, obj2, obj3) as the order of their values is not variable anymore.

Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Lag in asynchronous replication
Следующее
От: lin
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] postgres source code function "internal_ping" may be not right insome conditions