Re: Prepared statements considered harmful
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Prepared statements considered harmful |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22704.1157050728@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Prepared statements considered harmful (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Prepared statements considered harmful
Re: Prepared statements considered harmful |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Driver interfaces expose very clearly to the user an explicit
>> interface to prepare and execute a query separately.
> The JDBC documentation merely contains statements of the sort "A SQL
> statement with or without IN parameters can be pre-compiled and stored
> in a PreparedStatement object. This object can then be used to
> efficiently execute this statement multiple times." There is
> absolutely no indication that the execution plan of the statement is
> computed at the time of preparation.
The key word there is "efficiently". I think it is a reasonable
presumption on the user's part that a query done this way will have less
overhead than just resubmitting the raw query each time.
The important thing I see here is that JDBC allows use of IN parameters
with or without a PreparedStatement (no?). So they've separated the
concepts of out-of-line parameters and "preparing" a statement. That's
the distinction we have unfortunately fudged in the V3 protocol.
The protocol does let you use OOL parameters without retaining a
prepared plan, thanks to the hack introduced later to not plan the
unnamed statement at Parse time, but that's definitely a bit of a wart
on the original protocol design. Maybe it's good enough, or maybe not.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: