Re: Missing ColLabel tokens

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Missing ColLabel tokens
Дата
Msg-id 22697.978644672@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Missing ColLabel tokens  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Missing ColLabel tokens  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I have noticed that AND and TRAILING could be made ColLabel's without
> further changes.  Currently they are completely reserved.  (This is
> especially odd given that OR is a ColLabel.)  Would that be okay to
> change?

If you don't get shift/reduce conflicts, go for it.

> (For the interested, the only other completely reserved tokens are TYPE
> and AS.)

I suspect we're stuck on that for AS.  However, TYPE is actually allowed
as a ColId, via the 'generic' production, so in reality it's not
reserved.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Peterson
Дата:
Сообщение: md5 c code
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing ColLabel tokens