Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole
Дата
Msg-id 22691.993685766@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Ответы Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> At 12:27 27/06/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I propose that initdb should do
>> REVOKE ALL on pg_largeobject FROM public

> May have an issue with PG_DUMP, which does a 'select oid from
> pg_largeobject', I think.

Hmm.  [sound of grepping]  So does psql's \lo_list command.  That's
annoying ... the list of large object OIDs is *exactly* what you'd want
to hide from the unwashed masses.  Oh well, I'll leave bad enough alone
for now.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: functions returning records
Следующее
От: "Dmitry G. Mastrukov"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier