Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
Дата
Msg-id 22674.1303140344@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1  (Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> writes:
> On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
>> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
>> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
>> sent over.  For instance, previous versions:

> Am I right in thinking that would be that change committed on the 7th
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-04/msg00039.php) ?

Yes, that one.

> What concerns me
> most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been
> broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
> that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?

+1 for doing something along that line.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1