Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql
Дата
Msg-id 22586.1290359761@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql  (tv@fuzzy.cz)
Ответы Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
tv@fuzzy.cz writes:
>> Second, I modified the work_mem setting to 2GB (reloaded config) and I see
>> a response time of 38 seconds. Results below from EXPLAIN ANALYZE:

> How did you reload the config? Using 'kill -HUP pid'? That should work
> fine. Have you cheched 'work_mem' after the reload?

> Because the explain plans are exactly the same (structure, estimated
> costs). The really interesting bit is this and it did not change at all

>    Buckets: 1024 Batches: 64  Memory Usage: 650kB

If that didn't change, I'm prepared to bet that the OP didn't actually
manage to change the active value of work_mem.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum blocks the operations of other manual vacuum
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql