Re: Statement-level rollback

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Statement-level rollback
Дата
Msg-id 22540.1544216573@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Statement-level rollback  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Statement-level rollback  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Well, look at this from this point of view: EnterpriseDB implemented
> this because of customer demand (presumably).  Fujitsu also implemented
> this for customers.  The pgjdbc driver implemented this for its users.
> Now 2ndQuadrant also implemented this, and not out of the goodness of
> our hearts.  Is there any room to say that there is no customer demand
> for this feature?

Yeah, but there is also lots of demand for stability in basic
transactional semantics.  I refer you again to the AUTOCOMMIT business;
there were a lot of claims that that wouldn't break too much, and they
were all wrong.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statement-level rollback
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statement-level rollback