Re: Unexpected VACUUM FULL failure

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Unexpected VACUUM FULL failure
Дата
Msg-id 22531.1186808575@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unexpected VACUUM FULL failure  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Incidentally, every time it comes up we recommend using CLUSTER or ALTER
> TABLE. And explaining the syntax for ALTER TABLE is always a bit fiddly. I
> wonder if it would make sense to add a "VACUUM REWRITE" which just did the
> same as the noop ALTER TABLE we're recommending people do anyways. Then we
> could have a HINT from VACUUM FULL which suggests considering VACUUM REWRITE.

Not that syntax, please :-(.  The trouble with VACUUM [adjective] is
that "adjective" has to become a fully reserved keyword, else the parser
can't tell it from a table name.  This is all right for FULL because
that's a reserved word anyway due to the outer join syntax, but I really
don't want to do it for any words that aren't otherwise reserved.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Wrote a connect-by feature
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unexpected VACUUM FULL failure