Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> I had a request from a customer asking if we could make a switch to
>> specifically disable the "unexpected EOF" message that fills lots of
>> peoples logs.
> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
> user-specified message types.
I agree with Simon --- a disable for that specific message seems like a
kluge, and an ugly one at that. (The right solution for this customer
is to fix their broken application.) But a generic filter capability
might be useful enough to justify its keep.
regards, tom lane