Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On lör, 2010-01-02 at 17:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As for the overhead, these queries are not zero-maintenance. I still
>> think that the usefulness of tab completion here is pretty darn
>> minimal,
>> since most people are more likely to rely on default_do_language;
> We really don't have any data on that, and it doesn't seem all that
> likely to me.
I'm not really objecting to putting in the patch entirely. I'm objecting
to carrying an extra completion query for it. I don't think hiding
languages with laninline=0 improves its usefulness at all, let alone
enough to justify extra maintenance burden.
regards, tom lane