Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22463.1028067874@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't like SET for it --- SET is for setting state that will persist
>> over some period of time, not for taking one-shot actions. We could
>> perhaps use a function that checks that it's been called by the
>> superuser.
> Should we have RESET clear the counter, perhaps RESET STATCOLLECTOR?
> I don't think we have other RESET variables that can't be SET, but I
> don't see a problem with it.
RESET is just a variant form of SET. It's not for one-shot actions
either (and especially not for one-shot actions against state that's
not accessible to SHOW or SET...)
I still like the function-call approach better.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: