Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:30:03AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, maybe this is also something which can be
>> done more easily if we improve the error reporting?  Right now it's fairly
>> cryptic IMO.

> This part may be tricky to get right I think, because the error comes
> directly from OpenSSL when negotiating the protocol used between the
> client and the server, like "no protocols available" or such.

Can we do something comparable to the backend's HINT protocol, where
we add on a comment that's only mostly-likely to be right?

            regards, tom lane