Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> (2018/01/15 11:35), Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/01/15 11:28, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> Seems like this has gotten a review (and quite a bit of down-stream
>>> discussion that seemed pretty positive), and the latest patch still
>>> applies cleanly and passes the regression tests- is there some reason
>>> it's still marked as Needs Review? Seems like it should really be in
>>> Ready for Committer state.
>>> Amit, if you agree, would you mind going ahead and changing it?
>> Sure, done.
> Thanks for reviewing, Amit!
Pushed. I think the long delay on this is really my fault for having
raised an incorrect objection initially --- apologies for that.
regards, tom lane