Re: Reduce DEBUG level of catcache refreshing messages
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reduce DEBUG level of catcache refreshing messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2240906.1748615922@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Reduce DEBUG level of catcache refreshing messages ("Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres@jeltef.nl> writes: > When testing extensions using pgregress, it can be useful to introduce > some new DEBUG logs which are specific to the extension and change the > log level during part of the of the test. > There's a problem though: Often a "rehashing catalog cache ..." debug > message will also show up in those cases. It's not always possible to > predict when these messages show, and when they do their contents can > easily change if changes are made to an unrelated test or when run > against a different Postgres version. This change lowers the log level > of these messages to DEBUG5, so that they can be ignored while still > showing other (more predictable) DEBUG messages. I don't have an opinion about the merits of this exact change, but I wish somebody would go through all our DEBUGn messages and come up with some coherent proposal for what the various levels should be used for. Right now I think those choices are purely idiosyncratic and have been made differently in different patches. Your usage example already suggests one possible rule: * DEBUG1 is reserved for testing patches and should never be used in permanent code. Maybe that particular idea is not appropriate for some reason. But if we could have *some* kind of explainable basis for assigning DEBUGn levels, I think our lives would be better. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: