Re: Python 3.1 support

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 12:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter was concerned about duplicative maintenance effort, but what I
>> think this patch shows is that (at least for the near future) both
>> could be built from a single source file.

> That seems reasonable if we can run both. Although I wonder if longer
> term (2.x is going to be support a long time) we will end up with
> frustration within the single source file trying to keep things
> straight.

Once it gets to the point where it's more trouble to keep them together
than not, we can split the source.  But judging from this patch, a
single source file is the ticket for the moment.
        regards, tom lane