Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"

>>>> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?

>>> Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
>>> deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
>>> the commit.  GUC as full_commit_recovery?
>> 
>> recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure.

> commit_stability?  reliable_commit?

What's wrong with synchronous_commit?  It's accurate and simple.
        regards, tom lane