Re: /tmp/.s.PGSQL.${PGPORT}
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: /tmp/.s.PGSQL.${PGPORT} |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22269.966663347@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | /tmp/.s.PGSQL.${PGPORT} ("Jim O'Rourke" <JimO@Routescape.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
"Jim O'Rourke" <JimO@Routescape.com> writes:
> Is anybody else having problems with the /tmp/.s.PGSQL.${PGPORT} file being
> removed by �cleantmp� et al.
> /tmp is a dumping ground that rightly gets cleaned out periodically.
/tmp is a damfool place to have put the socket file, no doubt about that.
But we are stuck with it now if we don't want to break existing
applications --- the location of the socket file is a critical hardwired
part of the wire-level protocol, since the client and server MUST both
know it *before* any communication happens.
This was argued back around 6.4, IIRC, and we decided to do nothing.
The argument in favor of doing nothing seems even stronger now, with a
couple more years worth of existing clients out there...
Solutions:
1. Tweak your tmp-cleaning cron job to not remove the socket file.
2. Use IP instead of Unix-socket connections, so that your clients
don't care whether the socket file is there or not.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: