Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22244.1553017591@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-03-19 13:18:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having said that ... a better argument for a new API is that it
>> could be explicitly designed to handle multiple queries, and in
>> particular make some provision for returning multiple PGresults.
> Oh, I completely agree, that'd be hugely useful.
Of course, you can do that already with PQsendQuery + a loop
around PQgetResult. So the question here is whether that can
be wrapped up into something easier-to-use. I'm not entirely
sure what that might look like.
We should also keep in mind that there's a perfectly valid
use-case for wanting to send a big script of commands and
just check for overall success or failure. So it's not like
PQexec's current behavior has *no* valid uses.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: