Re: BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS
Дата
Msg-id 2221347.1657722459@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> # for RLS user, index scan can only use column a, and filter by lower(b)
> set app.a=1;
> explain analyse select * from abc where a=1 and lower(b)='1234';
>      Index Scan using abc_a_lower_idx on abc
>          Index Cond: (a = 1)
>          Filter: (lower(b) = '1234'::text)

AFAICS this is operating as designed.  It's unsafe to apply the
non-leakproof condition until we've verified that the row has a = 1.

In the particular case shown here, it might be all right to do it,
but cases such as bitmap indexscans or lossy index opclasses could
result in live re-evaluations of the indexqual conditions at some
rows.  So we can't safely allow lower(b) to become part of the
indexquals.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_ctl cannot find postgresql.conf
Следующее
От: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Дата:
Сообщение: Excessive number of replication slots for 12->14 logical replication