Re: BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2221347.1657722459@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #17549: wrong index scan plan with RLS (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> # for RLS user, index scan can only use column a, and filter by lower(b)
> set app.a=1;
> explain analyse select * from abc where a=1 and lower(b)='1234';
> Index Scan using abc_a_lower_idx on abc
> Index Cond: (a = 1)
> Filter: (lower(b) = '1234'::text)
AFAICS this is operating as designed. It's unsafe to apply the
non-leakproof condition until we've verified that the row has a = 1.
In the particular case shown here, it might be all right to do it,
but cases such as bitmap indexscans or lossy index opclasses could
result in live re-evaluations of the indexqual conditions at some
rows. So we can't safely allow lower(b) to become part of the
indexquals.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: