Not-so-open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Not-so-open items
Дата
Msg-id 22157.1158198901@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Not-so-open items  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Not-so-open items  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
There are several entries on the 8.2 open-items list that I think can be
removed:
Fix backward array comparison - subset

Done (this was redundant with the containment-operator item)
Store only active XIDs in subtransaction cache

Per my note just now, this probably should wait for 8.3.
Double vacuum speed on tables with no indexes

I changed the locking thing I was worried about.  Unless Greg wants to
do some real-world performance measurements to confirm or refute that
change, I think this can be closed.
Fix excessive page checking for new btree split code

Per my note yesterday, I can't reproduce the misbehavior I saw six weeks
ago, so I recommend we leave the code alone.
Suppress error on bind parameters of unknown types

I haven't heard one single person speak up to say "yeah, that's a good
idea", so I conclude it probably isn't.  Recommend we not change it.


BTW, pushing out an 8.1.5 is probably a good idea, but what's it doing
in the 8.2 open-items list?  Especially in the "documentation" section?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixed length data types issue