Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22144.1484063715@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I'm not meaning to be funny or sarcastic or disrespectful when I say > that I think C is the best possible language for PostgreSQL. It works > great, and we've got a ton of investment in making it work. Yeah. There's certainly a whole lot of path dependency in that statement --- if you were starting to write Postgres from scratch today, you would very likely choose some other language. But given where we are, there's just not a lot of attraction in trying to convert to another language. As other people noted, the one path that might possibly make sense is a gradual upgrade to C++. But getting past the exceptions issue is a pretty high bar that we'd have to clear before we could do much in that direction; and it's not obvious that C++ would offer enough benefit to be worth it. Most of us would rather spend our time on new features or performance improvements, not fighting with a language changeover. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: