Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The code right now tests for 'cwd' first and just errors out if it can't
> find it. Is it worth refactoring it so you can run pg_dumpall from a
> directory you can't view? Instead of checking 'cwd' right at the start
> we would have to find it only when we need it, and in several places or
> in a function call. It doesn't seem worth it to me.
... and it would *still* fail if you tried to call pg_dumpall via a
symlink or relative path. Unless someone knows a portable way to
resolve symlinks without doing a chdir first, I think there's no
way to avoid the surprise factor.
regards, tom lane