Re: new heapcheck contrib module

I wrote:
> Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> The patch I *should* have attached last night this time:

> Thanks, I'll do some big-endian testing with this.

Seems to work, so I pushed it (after some compulsive fooling
about with whitespace and perltidy-ing).  It appears to me that
the code coverage for verify_heapam.c is not very good though,
only circa 50%.  Do we care to expend more effort on that?

            regards, tom lane