Re: Function call costs for SQL and PLPgSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Function call costs for SQL and PLPgSQL
Дата
Msg-id 22065.1182523582@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Function call costs for SQL and PLPgSQL  (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@gmail.com> writes:
> I need to create a huge SQL script to load 20+ M rows in a DB.
> I've been force to wrap the inserts into PG functions.
> I can write them in either SQl or PLPgSQL but don't know
> whether this can make a big difference as far as time of
> overall execution is concerned.

> Somewhere else I've been told that SQL function bodies get "inlined"
> during execution. Is thus correct to consider SQL functions "faster"
> that the conterpart written in PLPgSQL?

Inlining only applies to simple-SELECT SQL functions (ie, pure
functions).  For what you're trying to do, I think plpgsql will
be faster as well as more flexible.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vincenzo Romano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PGSQL 8.2.x] INSERT+INSERT
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to install Postgresql on MS Vista?