Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22044.1325711205@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> But, the OP makes me wonder: why can a standby only perform a
> restartpoint where the master performed a checkpoint? It seems like a
> standby ought to be able to create a restartpoint anywhere, just by
> writing everything, flushing it to disk, and update pg_control.
Perhaps, but then crash restarts would have to accept start pointers
that point at any random place in the WAL. I like the additional error
checking of verifying that there's a checkpoint recod there. Also
I think the full-page-write mechanism would no longer protect against
torn pages during replay if you did that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: