Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 22032.1474587229@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I have just encountered an apparent bug in pg_upgrade (or possibly pg_dump).
Hmm, it sort of looks like pg_dump believes it should dump the range's
constructor function in binary-upgrade mode, while the backend is creating
the constructor function during CREATE TYPE anyway. But if that's the
case, upgrade of user-defined range types would never have worked ...
seems like we should have noticed before now.
If that diagnosis is correct, we should either change pg_dump to not
dump that function, or change CREATE TYPE AS RANGE to not auto-create
the constructor functions in binary-upgrade mode. The latter might be
more flexible in the long run.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: