Re: elog() proposal

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, so elog(ERROR, ...) and PGError(msg, ...) would be the same.  Makes
> sense.  Should we consider hiding these in macros so they really still
> call elog(ERROR, ...) for backward compatiblity?

I would love to make them macros, but I don't know a portable way to
create macros with variable numbers of arguments.  Do you feel like
writing double parens?
PGERROR((msg, ...))
        regards, tom lane