Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
Дата
Msg-id
21924.1067352015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? (Christopher Kings-Lynne)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > Basically, my question is why ::regproc alone always addes the catalogue > qualification in this case? regproc adds the schema if the name would be ambiguous without it (or not visible at all). In these cases, the function name is still ambiguous with the schema :-( ... but there's nothing regproc can do about that, since it's not chartered to emit function arguments. Use regprocedure instead if you don't want to see schema names. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления