Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21918.1364337045@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> hmm - will look into that in a bit - but I also just noticed that on the
> same day spoonbill broke there was also a commit to that file
> immediately before that code adding the fflush() calls.
It's hard to see how those would be related to this symptom. My bet
is that the new fk-deadlock test exposed some pre-existing issue in
isolationtester. Not quite clear what yet, though.
A different line of thought is that the cancel was received by the
backend but didn't succeed in cancelling the query for some reason.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: