Re: no default hash partition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: no default hash partition
Дата
Msg-id 21893.1565212921@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: no default hash partition  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: no default hash partition  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Aug-07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, that's rather confusingly worded IMO.  Is the antecedent of "this
>> option" just DEFAULT, or does it mean that you can't use FOR VALUES,
>> or perchance it means that you can't use a PARTITION OF clause
>> at all?

> Uh, you're right, I hadn't noticed that.  Not my text.  I think this can
> be fixed easily as in the attached.  There are other options, but I like
> this one the best.

OK, but maybe also s/created as a default partition/created as the default
partition/ ?  Writing "a" carries the pretty clear implication that there
can be more than one, and contradicting that a sentence later doesn't
improve it.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Isaac Morland
Дата:
Сообщение: Documentation clarification re: ANALYZE
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation clarification re: ANALYZE