Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21863.1253980747@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Right, that works. Updated patch attached; should solve the issues
> raised in the thread. I renamed the catalog pg_db_role_setting as
> suggested by Tom.
> ...
> I have also added a view, whose only purpose is to convert the role and
> database OIDs into names. It's been named pg_db_role_settings, but if
> anyone has a better suggestion I'm all ears.
I dislike the idea of having a catalog and a view whose names are the
same except for a plural. It's confusing as heck, because no one will
remember which is which.
Since pg_settings is the existing user view, I think pg_db_role_settings
is a reasonable choice for the new view, but then we need a different
name for the catalog. The only thing that comes to mind right now is
"pg_db_role_default", but I don't like it much. Anybody have other
suggestions?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: