Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21845.1290473194@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/22/2010 06:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe instead of "textual label", we should say "name"? But that
>> doesn't seem like quite le mot juste either. "label" is actually a
>> pretty good word for the text representation of an enum value.
> Oh my boots and buttons. I think we're splitting some very fine hairs
> here. A few weeks back you were telling us that label wasn't a very good
> word and shouldn't be sanctified in the SQL.
It isn't a very good word for the abstract value, IMO, but the text
representation is a different concept.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: