Re: CVS HEAD compile failure
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CVS HEAD compile failure |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21821.1070908055@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CVS HEAD compile failure (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CVS HEAD compile failure
Re: CVS HEAD compile failure |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
> In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
shows the failure), and I think Bruce is also using something less than
the latest. It's possible that more recent gcc's are able to figure out
that the reference to free_func should be interpreted as a parameter
name and not a typedef.
In fact, trying your test program fails here:
$ gcc -Wall zzz.c
zzz.c:8: parse error before `free_func'
zzz.c:8: parse error before `)'
$
so "compiler difference" definitely seems to be the answer.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: