Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses

On 3/7/2025 04:02, Tender Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com <mailto:lepihov@gmail.com>> 于2025年7 
> 月2日周三 22:29写道：
> 
>     On 30/6/2025 04:38, Tender Wang wrote:
>      >     Do you think it's worth doing this?
>      >
>      >
>      > Hi all,
>      >
>      > I have added this patch to commitfest[1]. I'm hoping someone can
>     review
>      > it for me.
>     It makes sense to apply. If you return the comment to its place, you
>     may
>     reduce the patch size even more.
> 
> 
> Thanks for reviewing. I returned the comment to its place. Please review 
> the attached patch.
Do you really need to initialise clauses with the NIL value? I guess, it 
may be avoided because later you non-alternatively init it with a copy 
of hash clauses.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov