Re: BUG #17618: unnecessary filter column <> text even after adding index
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17618: unnecessary filter column <> text even after adding index |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2174559.1663977891@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | BUG #17618: unnecessary filter column <> text even after adding index (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17618: unnecessary filter column <> text even after adding index
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
>>> So I think we need to run eval_const_expressions on indexquals before we
>>> check for duplicate clauses, something like attached.
>> [ squint... ] Surely that was done long before we ever get here?
> We should have already done that long before. It seems afterwards we may
> do additional transformation on indexquals. In this case with a boolean
> index, I can see we convert the indexqual to form 'indexkey = TRUE' in
> match_boolean_index_clause.
Of course, but what about that transformation would introduce something
that eval_const_expressions could simplify? (Actually, now that I think
about it, I think eval_const_expressions would break it completely because
it'd re-canonicalize the expression as just 'indexkey', exactly what we
don't want here.) In any case, if there's something between the
eval_const_expressions pass and createplan.c that introduces simplifiable
expressions, I think it's on that something's head to re-simplify; we
don't want to do something so expensive in a main code path if it's
usually going to be a complete waste.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: