Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Дата
Msg-id 21733.949966613@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Now, how to convert these?  Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> pg_dump supplies the ops.  Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> releases.  Comments?

Actually, rather than hacking gram.y, it seems like it would be cleaner
to put the kluge in whatever part of the parser looks up the ops name.

Of course a kluge is a kluge no matter what...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
Следующее
От: Chris Bitmead
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ONLY