Re: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 216933.1737661757@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > I believe, that the export of PG_OOM_ADJUST_FILE should not point to the > file that the postmaster uses, but should be for example: > export PG_OOM_ADJUST_FILE=/proc/self/oom_score_adj_child > As if the example is blindly followed, then postmaster version of the file > would be updated and become a candidate to be killed. I don't think so. In the first place, you misunderstand what this variable does: it is only consulted by postmaster child processes not the postmaster itself. In the second place, "/proc/self/oom_score_adj_child" isn't universal (it does not exist on any of the Red-Hat-based distros I checked). If it were universal and had the semantics that I guess it means from the name, we could perhaps implement this feature differently and more simply. But it's not, and I don't see a lot of value in supporting two different implementations. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: