Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Дата
Msg-id 21653.949966251@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Now, how to convert these?  Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> pg_dump supplies the ops.  Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> releases.  Comments?

Ugly, but probably the best stopgap for backwards compatibility ...
at least I can't think of a better answer, since we have no way to
change what 6.5 pg_dump will dump.

You're only going to suppress "network_ops" if it appears in the
ops position of a CREATE INDEX, right?  Don't want to stop people
from using the name for fields and so on.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vince Vielhaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] New Globe
Следующее
От: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [HACKERS] TODO item